-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
Adds a RFC overview #23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for ember-rfcs ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
May need to add library to the prerender URLs |
const result = []; | ||
|
||
for (let fileContents of data) { | ||
result.push({number: fileContents.number, link: fileContents.rfcFile, title: fileContents.title,stage: fileContents.currentStage}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
since we're showing proposed things we won't always have a link to the rfcFile 🤔 should we also be exposing github links? what is the UX around this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question, I think we might want to add the GitHub links as a seperate thing (with the open external link icon) so that it's clearer what a link means.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yea I agree, but I think it's probably fine to default to linking to the actual RFC when it's available 👍
For documentation purposes: My use case is to quickly find the canonical URL for an RFC at release time so that it can be referenced in CHANGELOGs and blog posts. |
With the new design we broke @kategengler's workflow of searching for an RFC in the side menu, so we now have the library page, showing the number, title and the stage. The only thing we need to figure out is the linking thing when RFCs are closed/merged or still in proposed stage. We can merge this now, and fix that later, or maybe I can fix it tomorrow.
